Monthly Archives: August 2008

Tonight: Dave Barger Pillow Talks With Larry King

Pillows

As I said to someone this afternoon, I’m not sure why anyone would willingly want to go on the Larry King show these days, it having turned into a tabloid-on-television entree more often than not of late.

But, apparently a lot of people still watch him.

So tonight, Dave Barger, CEO of JetBlue, will be on the show, discussing the airline’s decision to remove all the filthy germ-ridden laundered-every-two-weeks pillows and blankets with clean ones you buy once and keep.

Hey, just doing my civic duty here. The show is on at 8 PM CDT, on CNN.

No word yet if the WSJ’s Deal Yenta is going to one of the other guests, quizzing him about how he should sell the airline to Southwest. Before he gets really desperate.

Mindless Memos in the WSJ About JetBlue

For-Sale-Pic

A reader alerted me to an article in Tuesday’s online Wall Street Journal concerning JetBlue.

If you are a WSJ subscriber, you can access the entire column by clicking here.

The column was written by Heidi N. Moore, who writes under the moniker “Deal Yenta.”

Her topic for the day was “Should JetBlue Sell Itself?”

Predictably, Deal Yenta opened the column by jumping all over JetBlue’s announcement concerning how passengers will now be able to purchase nice clean sealed pillows and blankets for $7 on their longer haul flights, as an alternative to the free nasty germ-laden things that should never be used by anyone.

But, for some reason, this move then prompted the Deal Yenta to come to the conclusion that perhaps the airline should sell itself — to Southwest Airlines.



Needless to say, when our reader told me about the column, I thought he was kidding.

No, he wasn’t.

And I quote from this rather amusing-in-a-sad-sort-of-way piece,

“Many analysts have said the best way for airlines to cut capacity is to merge. JetBlue is far from desperate right now. Morgan Stanley analyst William Greene recently noted that the airline industry isn’t yet at the tipping point where carriers have to wrestle with consolidation or bankruptcy. That means that if JetBlue were to consider selling itself now, it wouldn’t be a desperation move. And that is the point. Wouldn’t it be better to do something while there is still plenty of time to maneuver and get the best deal possible?”

Lufthansa now owns a nice chunk of JetBlue, the airline did okay in the second quarter, and frankly, Dave Barger did not sound remotely desperate in the airline’s second quarter call. Or, at least he didn’t sound any more desperate than most other CEOs we’ve listened to of late. In fact, I’d say he almost has reason to be relatively calm, compared to some other CEOs.

Oh, and the $7 pillow and blanket package? I don’t have a problem with it at all — and my guess is that a lot of the JetBlue passenger base on the longer-haul flights will appreciate the opportunity to have a nice clean pillow and blanket. And hey, they can keep them and bring them back on the return flight!

So why in the world should this move indicate that JetBlue should consider selling itself? Much less to Southwest? Oh, and yes, while she did briefly acknowledge the obvious glaring incompatibility — the two have absolutely nothing in common in terms of fleet types — that problem was just as briefly — dismissed.

This, after the Deal Yenta also mentioned, “If JetBlue does decide to flip its script and consider a sale, the most obvious fit might be Southwest Airlines. Both Southwest and JetBlue are so-called point-to-point airlines.”

Is JetBlue a true point to point airline? What the heck is that huge operation at JFK? Ahhhh. Last time I looked I think it was a hub.

As we all know, there are a few true point-to-point airlines and then there are hub carriers, and then we have all the in-between hybrids. Both Southwest and JetBlue are hybrids to a certain extent. Just in very different ways.

Sheesh.

Columns like this just make me crazy.

Frontier Chooses Door Number Two For DIP Financing; Republic Is a Player

Frontierair-1

Frankly, this proposal makes much more sense to me than the DIP deal that was announced recently with Perseus. I was not a big fan of the deal — or at least what I had read about it. As I said then, I had anticipated there would be another airline involved in any deal for Frontier. For two reasons. One, it makes more sense than some kind of stand-alone venture, and two, if it was a good airline, with a reasonably strong management team, the sharing of management bench strength would be a plus.

This one hits on both counts, as best as I can tell at this early stage of the game.

Today, Frontier Airlines announced that it was going to go with an alternative DIP financing proposal that is anchored by members of the airline’s Unsecured Creditors Committee. The three key players in this deal are Republic Airlines Holdings, Credit Suisse, and AQR Capital.

The three are offering the airline up to $75 million in DIP financing, with an immediate firm commitment and funding of $30 million.

This new DIP facility provides Frontier with lower financing costs, less restrictive covenants and greater flexibility to pursue strategic opportunities without being constrained by more restrictive DIP provisions, according to a release the airline put out.

Sounds much better to me.

United, ALPA Throw Back Some Beers and Agree to ….Well We’re Not Sure

Gavel2-2

The Associated Press reports this afternoon that United Airlines says it has reached an agreement with ALPA to “limit what the company calls work slowdowns that forced cancellation of hundreds of flights and cost millions of dollars.”

Neither the airline nor the union is talking specifics about just what was worked out. But whatever it is, supposedly this “agreement” will be in effect until hearings are held Aug. 27-28 on the airline’s suit seeking a preliminary injunction against the union.

According to the report, all parties met in open court on Thursday to schedule hearings. When it became clear that the hearing on the preliminary injunction would not take place until the end of the month, U.S. District Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow asked the parties to reach an agreement protecting United from excessive cancellations.

The parties met behind closed doors in Lefkow’s chambers on Friday morning and then canceled a second session set for Friday afternoon.

Instead, the airline said that an order would be filed with the court setting Aug. 27-28 for the hearing on the preliminary injunction.

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Chinese Method of Dealing with Unhappy Passengers: Punish the Airlines

China Cold

Sitting on a tarmac for hours? Upset with your airline because your plane is late?

Well, just be glad you’re not in China. Or worse, running an airline that operates in China.

Today the Financial Express reported that China will punish airlines whose passengers refuse to disembark or misbehave in protest over problems like delayed flights, as the Olympics host tries to” lift standards” before the Games.

Deputy head of the China  civil aviation regulator, Yang Guoqing, said enough was enough after numerous warnings to airlines to treat their passengers better appeared to have failed.

“We will severely punish airlines which experience aircraft occupations and other incidents as a result of service reasons which originate with the airline,” Yang told a news conference.

“These measures include cancelling slots at corresponding busy airports,” he added. Shhhhhhhsh. Better not let Kate Hanni hear about this idea.

State media reported this week that scores of Chinese passengers smashed computers and desks and clashed with police after a night stranded at an airport without accommodation.

More than 170 passengers were due to leave Kunming, capital of southwestern Yunnan province, on three flights operated by China Southern Airlines late Monday, but the flights were cancelled due to bad weather, the Xinhua news agency said.

The report blamed the melee on China Southern staff’s ‘inappropriate working attitude.’ Yang said customers “must also be kept better informed about delays, especially those caused by bad weather, a big issue in China.”

Hmmm. I wonder. Is bad weather a big issue in China, or keeping passengers better informed about the bad weather?

Happy Birthday To Us: PlaneBusiness Empire Begins It’s 12th year

Hotchocolatecupcake.Preview

Well, not to PlaneBuzz, exactly, but to PlaneBusiness.



On this day in 1997, PlaneBusiness went public. On AOL.

Yep. We had our own keyword and everything.

PlaneBusiness Banter, and PlaneBusiness.com followed shortly after, as we published our first issue the first week of September, 1997. The first PBBs were sent by email. They were not published on the website as they are now.

Until two years ago, our first attempts at this fledgling enterprise were still there — on AOL’s servers. Lost in the bowels of everything else that had come since then.

You could still put in keyword “airlinebiz” and our pitiful (by today’s standards) first venture onto the Internet was there to gaze at in astonishment.

Yes, I was always astounded when I would go back and look at it. Astounded at how fast all of what we now take for granted online has actually come about.

Then again, I still have a 9800K modem in the closet. And I remember when I thought it was latest greatest thing.

I’m off to find a Mexican chocolate cupcake. Yes, just like that one up there. Which means I’ll probably have to bake it myself.

But that’s the least I can do, considering today is such an auspicious occasion.