Tag Archives: airline earnings

Good Morning Earthlings: US Airways Looking to Remove E-190s, Southwest Airlines Continues to Do the Revenue Two-Step; Liquidity Is THE Story For the Quarter

ex-german-bunker-canadian.jpg

Holly here. Reporting from the airline earnings bunker where I have been toiling since last week.

This week’s PlaneBusiness Banter will be posted later today. It’s one of those monster issues. Next week’s issue will be just as packed, as we finish up from the group that reported last week. Just way too many earnings reports compressed in too short a period of time last week. Whew.

Having said that, it was an interesting group of calls last week. Just a couple of tidbits from what we heard.

One, US Airways, which has flirted with the idea of grounding its Embraer 190 fleet in the past — in an effort to cut capacity further at the airline — sounds like it is now looking at the possibility in a much more serious way. Because of the airline’s contract with its pilots — the airline is constrained in terms of how much flying it can remove. But it could remove the 25 Embraer 190 fleet in one fell swoop — thus cutting their capacity by 2.5%. It’s really the only option the airline has left if it wants to cut capacity further and in listening to the airline’s call last week, it sounds like the airline is very close to pulling the trigger on the move.

Two, I’m getting pretty tired of hearing the folks at Southwest Airlines keep talking about all these revenue initiatives they are going to do in the …future. Third quarter, fourth quarter. First quarter 2010. Who knows.

I am assuming the reason the airline keeps talking about all these things we are going to see — someday — is because the airline does not have the technological backbone in place to do them ..NOW.

Meanwhile the airline still does not charge for passenger bags. And revenues generated from their Business Select program continue to be under original forecast.

I think there is way too much money being left on the table here.

Three, the whole question of liquidity and who has it and who doesn’t permeated the calls last week.

Jamie Baker and Mark Streeter, analysts at JP Morgan Chase found themselves right in the middle of the fray after they published a note on where they saw United, American Airlines, and US Airways in the “Dance of the Cash Constrained.”

Hoping to clear up any confusion they had caused with their note, they issued another note later in the week in which they wrote:

Did We Not Make Ourselves Clear? – We are surprised by the volume of incoming calls from people who believe that our view is that LCC [US Airways] somehow disappears.

As noted earlier this week, “assuming LCC or UAUA die off, as we believe some do, is a mistake, in our opinion.” What we do take issue with is US Airways’ ability to raise incremental capital should industry fundamentals deteriorate further or even remain stuck here in neutral. There has been very little dialogue, as near as we can tell, as to the potential that 2010 demand may prove as bad as 2009’s. Alternatively, bump up your RASM and fuel by similar amounts and one’s industry models probably won’t show any meaningful improvement. It is against this backdrop that we continue to believe that borrowing power (as well as the need for incremental borrowing) at AMR & UAUA significantly exceeds that of LCC. Put another way, AMR needs to borrow a lot of money, and we think it has plenty of ways to do so. United needs to borrow less, and we think it also has a few bullets left to fire in the capital-raising gun. However, our view on LCC is that while its near-term needs are arguably low, its capital-raising options appear largely nonexistent if demand trends simply bump along from here or in fact worsen. We therefore believe that some form of Washington-mandated combination might potentially occur. Nothing this earnings season changed our view in this regard, nor our opinion that risk/reward in LCC shares remains weak assuming most scenarios short of quick recovery (though LCC’s peer-leading 54% decline since May 6th obviously tempers our negativity).

I’d suggest you tread very softly when discussing liquidity with US Airways‘ CEO Doug Parker however. Doug went on another one of his “liquidity rants” in the airline’s call last week. Deja vu all over again. It was just last year at about the same time that analysts were saying US Airways didn’t have enough cash to get through the winter. Then they pulled off that slick $1 billion financing deal out of nowhere.

As someone observed about this industry — don’t underestimate the ability of an airline to find cash.

No matter how bad the business environment.

Airlines: Don’t Look Now, But Oil Prices Are on the March

oil-rig.jpg.jpeg

In the midst of all the giddy sentiment that is starting to take hold in the industry concerning the “stabilization” in demand decline — a fact that April RASM estimates issued by some airlines have fueled this week — a new ugly problem is starting to make itself known. That ugly problem? Higher fuel prices.

As they say, if it’s not one thing, it’s another in this industry.

The big question concerning the recent relatively calm period of lower oil prices was this one — how fast would they start to ratchet up when the economy began to shows signs of recovery?

We, unfortunately, are starting to see that apparently the answer to that question is — pretty fast.

If you have not looked at the oil futures market lately, here is the bad news. As I post this (at about 1:30 PM CDT), the price of a barrel of crude is now sitting at 58.55, up almost $2 bucks for the day. Just two weeks ago, the price of crude closed at 50.80. Last Friday, it closed at 53.20.

Today’s price is the highest price that crude has posted since November.

What is fueling the push?

A combination of some encouraging signs on the economic front, U.S. equity markets that seem to believe the worst is over (whether it is or not) and a weaker U.S. dollar.

As most of you know, a declining US dollar makes dollar-priced oil cheaper for foreign buyers and tends to encourage demand, leading to higher prices.

Yes, it is indeed a vicious circle.

And one damn frustrating one if you are an airline. Do you hedge or not? At what price levels? With what hedging instruments?

Remember that many airlines were still paying the price (and dearly) in the first quarter for making the wrong move on oil futures last year.

What makes this rapid rise in the price of oil potentially more troubling for the industry than the record-breaking rise last summer is that it is rearing its ugly head at a time when the level of demand, i.e., revenue, has fallen through the floor.

What Did This Quarter’s Earnings Tell Us?

thinkingcapwhoa_color.gif

It’s Friday. Do you know how well YOUR favorite airline did for the first quarter of 2009?

As of today, all the major airlines have reported earnings.

So what have we learned? A couple of things.

One, Allegiant Air continues to blow away everybody else on the block. The travel company, which happens to include an airline that happens to fly only MD-80s that also happens to make money hand over fist had a spectacular first quarter. As I mentioned earlier this week, a 31.3% operating margin was posted by the airline.

You just don’t see margins like that in this industry.

I told you guys not to believe that anti-Allegiant rant that CNBC’s Jim Cramer spewed out not too long ago. Cramer, by lumping ALGT with Las Vegas “casino stocks,” proved that his research is lacking.

We also learned this week that AirTran had a great first quarter. No, the results were not as stratospheric as those of Allegiant, but they were pretty damn good. Nice fat profit, and nice big declines in costs. Excellent job.

We also learned that while we may have hit a point where declines in demand have more or less leveled out — nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, (well, except for Allegiant) is ready to call what is going to happen in May and June.

Preliminary bookings are down — but will they recover, as more and more passengers continue to book tickets closer in? Then again, at the heart of the demand decline here in the U.S. is the declining number of premium passengers. That is only going to improve when the economy improves.

What I might have concerns about if I were an airline other than Allegiant is just how much of that previous business travel my airline had before does return. Even if the economy picks up.

You don’t have to look very far to see what is happening in companies both big and small these days. Companies are cutting back on travel and are using video conferencing more and more. Heck, today anyone with a laptop can connect via video to a small one-on-one meeting or to a meeting with many more participants. There is no question that the quality and ease, not to mention the low to no-cost of such efforts — has changed dramatically just in the last couple of years.

So yes, I am concerned that going forward — if a company gets used to using video conferencing as a result of the current belt-tightening — is that same company going to be anxious to start spending money on sending their employees to far-flung regions of the country? Much less the rest of the world? Just because they now have a little extra money to spend?

I’m not so sure.

And, if this is the case — which airlines stand the best chance of inheriting the earth? Or at least the bulk of the shorter-term profit kitty? Those airlines that cater to the leisure traveler and have the low fares and low cost structure to make money doing so.

Which is one of the reasons why Morgan Stanley analyst Bill Greene recently advised airline stock investors to move out of U.S. legacy carriers and into low cost, low fare airlines such as Allegiant, AirTran and JetBlue. US Airways kind of sneaks in there as well, as it has the lower fares and the lower cost structure and a bigger domestic market than that of American, United, Delta, or Continental.

Good Morning! PBB On Its Way; ALGT Keeps Piling On The Good News

AllegiantPlanePhoto.jpg.jpeg

Good morning earthlings. We are putting the final touches on this week’s long issue of PlaneBusiness Banter. Yes, it’s our first official earnings issue of the first quarter earnings season, and both American Airlines and Southwest Airlines get a very long look in this week’s issue.

I’ll post a note here when it is finished and posted for subscribers to read.

But in the meantime, I just wanted to mention an extremely impressive metric that was posted by Allegiant Travel in the first quarter.

While it is impressive enough that the airline posted better than expected profits for the quarter late on Sunday — as the company reported earnings of $28.2 million or $1.37 a share — that is only the tip of the impressive news.

The really impressive statistic in these results?

The airline posted a 31.3% operating margin.

Got that?

If that mind-numbing number doesn’t get your attention, I don’t know what will.

More later. Have to go finish this week’s PBB.

Southwest Airlines: Not Overly Impressed With First Quarter Stats; Neither is S&P

southwest_airlines_logo.jpg.jpeg

Thursday Southwest Airlines announced its first quarter earnings. Clearly the big headline grabber here was the fact the airline posted its first loss (no ifs, ands, or buts, much less special charge excuses) in 17 years.

The airline lost $91 million in the first quarter, or $0.12 a share. That amount included a loss of $71 million due to the falling value of its fuel hedges.

Without the fuel hedge losses, the airline posted a loss of $20 million or 3 cents a share.

Analyst consensus had the airline posting a loss of a penny, so the loss was more than analysts had expected.

Worse, CEO Gary Kelly said in the airline’s earnings call that RASM, which declined 2.9 points in the first quarter, could take an even bigger hit in the second quarter.

The airline also announced that it was offering a buyout to virtually all employees, had instituted a hiring freeze and was freezing pay for its top execs.

A couple of observations. One, I know more than one Southwest Airlines Captain who, for the most part, sat around eating bon-bons for much of the first quarter. And yet, the pilots at the airline were just given a tentative agreement that, if anything, sweetened the pot. It doesn’t take a mathematician to figure out that the costs involved in having more pilots than the airline needs right now is costing the airline a pretty penny.

Two, while the airline can offer buyouts to employees — the timing is not exactly the best for this kind of move, as the airline’s employees have seen the value of their Southwest Airlines‘ shares in their 401(k) accounts fall precipitously over the last year.

So while I applaud the airline for attempting to right the downsizing ship by natural attrition and voluntary departures, I’m afraid I have to wonder if these measures are going to be enough.

Three, I still think the airline’s growth plan is too aggressive, it’s capital spending plans too ambitious for 2009.

Third, I’m not the only one.

This morning Standard and Poor’s put the airline’s debt ratings on Credit Watch with negative implications. As we all know, this move is usually a precursors to a ratings cut.

S&P put Southwest’s “BBB+” rated long-term corporate credit rating on negative Credit Watch because of 1) the airline’s first quarter performance, 2) it’s forecast for its second quarter revenue and 3) the fact that the airline has added more than $700 million in debt since just late last year, increasing its interest expense.

This increase in debt is a direct result of the airline having engaged in aircraft sale-leasebacks in an attempt to increase its liquidity.

I would add that this amount is only going to increase in the second quarter. As I reported in a recent PBB, there is yet another traunche of sale-leaseback financing in the works with BOC Aviation that is set to close in the second quarter. BOC has handled the bulk of the airline’s recent sale-leaseback transactions.

Note that anything below “BBB” is no longer considered “investment” grade. It then falls into the “junk category.”

My gut feeling is that we will see Southwest lose its lofty “investment grade” debt rating status before this downturn is finished.

Allegiant Air Pre-Announces Earnings

elvis.jpg.jpeg

Late Tuesday Las Vegas-based Allegiant Air pre-announced that it will report earnings for the first quarter of between $1.34 to $1.38 per share.

This estimate is far above the then-forecast estimate by analysts for the airline — which had estimated the airline would post a profit of $1.20 a share.

The airline will report earnings this coming Monday.

So why the uptick from previous company guidance?

Analyst Dave Fintzen with Barclays, who recently initiated coverage of the airline’s stock (we talked about his recent research note on the airline in the latest edition of PlaneBusiness Banter) said today that because the airline gave no details other than the higher EPS estimate, it’s a bit hard to know where the better performance for the airline was. Although he assumes it was all on the revenue side, with revenue probably outperforming even the previous management guidance.

So what is Dave going to be looking for when the airline reports on Monday? Any feedback on the airline’s booking trends in its new markets, especially Los Angeles, in addition to any updated information on where the airline is going to grow now — as we move into the second quarter and third quarters.

Gary Chase Note On Airlines Today: It’s Been A Tiring Airline Earnings Season

wallstreetone.jpg

The headline on Gary Chase’s research wrap-up piece today was entitled, “Thoughts After A Tiring Airline Earnings Season.”

That is exactly how I feel today, after the onslaught of reports this week. Particularly yesterday’s almost non-stop roll out of reports.

Chase, airline analyst with Barclays, commented today, “Mercifully, airline earnings season is over.”

Not quite. We still have a number of regional airlines to hear from. Then there are all the international carriers who report on a very different schedule. But as far as the big guns in the U.S. are concerned, yes, the noisy din that was created from a slew of very “noisy” earnings reports this quarter has now, finally, ended.

I’m still not sure which airlines we are going to take a closer look at in this week’s issue of PBB, because we had too many report in during the week. The issue would simply be too unwieldy in terms of size if we were to go into our usual detail on all eight. But after finishing up the last earnings transcript reading this morning, I’ll pick four for this week, and the rest will get their look-see next week.

But let’s get away from the specifics for a minute and look, as Gary did today, at the overall sense we got from listening to the calls over the last two weeks.

I’d sum it up by saying this: there is a lot of fear out there concerning demand. The immediate revenue landscape looks frightening and it’s not clear where the revenue versus demand level is going to settle. And god forbid if the price of oil starts to move up again.

As Gary said in his note this morning,

“We have entered the stage of the airline story where the thesis gets tested. We all know it takes a lot of revenue erosion to offset the benefits the industry will reap from extraordinary capacity reductions and breathtaking declines in fuel (now materially more than 9/11). However, now comes the hard part. The part where we actually have to observe the revenue declines rather than analyze sensitivities in our models. With revenue fading quickly, as it always does, faith is suddenly hard to come by.

The near-term isn’t going to be easy, in our view. The next potential catalysts will likely come on the revenue front and as CAL previewed yesterday, the RASM comps are going to be negative. In fact, our largely unchanged forecasts contemplate negative RASM comps in every single month of the year, with the exception of November. We currently believe 1Q will see the toughest comparisons.”

Translation? If you thought the fourth quarter numbers looked bad — just wait until mid-April when the first quarter numbers roll out.

However, as far as we can tell — most analysts continue to hold onto the belief that the benefits that come from the drop in the price of oil will more than compensate for whatever drop in demand the airlines continue to feel.

One PlaneBusiness Banter subscriber wrote me this week, “I think these guys on Wall Street are not connected to the real world. In your last issue in December you asked your readers to tell you how they felt about 2009. And you said yourself that you were surprised at the overall level of negativity readers expressed. I wasn’t. And I think your readers were, and are, closer to the mark than these guys who make their living transposing spreadsheets and getting lost in the numbers are.”

Thoughts? I think it’s time we open this up to PlaneBuzz readers for their take. Is 2009 still going to be the blockbuster earnings year for the airline industry that every Wall Street analyst on the planet said was going to be the case?

As always, you can comment here on Buzz — or you can send your notes to me directly.

Southwest Airlines’ Stock Goes Up, Goes Back Down

southwest_over_new_mexico.jpg

I’ve had a couple of emails this morning from readers wondering why Southwest Airlines’ shares, which rose yesterday on the news that the airline was essentially shutting down the growth faucets, are now moving in the opposite direction today.

As of this posting, shares of Southwest have lost 17% for the day, now trading around 8.10 a share, down from their close yesterday of 9.81.

So what gives?

Simple. The market reacted positively yesterday to the headline news: growth being curbed.

Today, investors have had more time to think about the rest of the news the airline gave us yesterday. And, investors have also had the benefit of a number of airline analyst research notes on the results.

From Gary Chase, analyst with Barclays:

LUV results were better than we expected, largely on better passenger revenue performance. Non-fuel costs came in a touch better, but remain under pressure. We expect LUV will benefit from industry capacity reductions and lower fuel prices, but don’t see nearly as compelling an opportunity in LUV shares as we see in other names…….2009 estimate is reduced from $0.65 to $0.45, principally on lower passenger revenue assumptions.We’ve been modeling RASM out-performance for LUV relative to other LFCs and the industry at-large given its revenue initiatives, but think it will be increasingly difficult for the company to outperform the industry to that extent given economic slowing.”

From Kevin Crissey, UBS Securities:

…”Our view on the stock

We view LUV’s valuation as getting stretched. It is trading at we view as an ‘okay’ 6x 2009 EV/EBITDAR but a robust 16x our 2009 EPS estimate. With growth non-existent, unit costs rising, economic fuel prices above peers and the balance sheet okay but less impressive, we question whether there is upside potential to valuation from here. We are cautious on LUV and rate it Neutral…”

From Ray Neidl, Calyon Securities:

“We believe investors should take profit,” Neidl said in a research note this morning as the firm dropped its target price on the shares from $8 to $7. The firm also cuts its rating on the stock from underperform to “sell.”

When was the last time we saw a “sell” rating on shares of Southwest?

Continental Airlines, Southwest Airlines Report Earnings

earnings-1.jpg

It’s Friday and Wall Street is up to its volatile tricks again today. Should be interesting to see where the numbers end at the close of the day.

Meanwhile, Continental Airlines and Southwest Airlines reported their third quarter earnings Thursday.

The Cliff Notes version of the results?

The numbers for both airlines — on their face — were very weird. Just as we saw yesterday with American and Delta. Weird in that with capacity being pulled out and oil prices through the roof for much of the third quarter, we again saw cost per ASM figures solidly in the double-digit category for both airlines.

But revenues were also up — especially at Southwest.

Continental reported a loss of $236 million or $2.14 a share. Excluding $91 million of previously announced special items, Continental recorded a net loss of $145 million or $1.32 a share.

Southwest’s numbers are a bit more complicated to break down — as a result of the airline’s fuel hedges.

Southwest reported net income excluding special items and SFAS 133 unrealized gains and losses of $69 million. Or $0.09 a share. This was two cents better than analyst consensus.

However, because of the drop in the value of crude oil, the airline had to write down the value of its fuel hedging transactions. (That is the bulk of that “SFAS 133 unrealized gains and losses” accounting mumbo jumbo up there.)

When you factor in those write-downs, the airline lost $120 million for the quarter, or $0.16.

That’s right. All those great fuel hedges the airline has stocked up on aren’t so great when the price of oil begins to plummet.

As for honest-to-gosh cash in the bank? The airline ended the quarter with $1.5 billion. With an incremental $200 million of a revolving credit line still available.

Four fully detailed reports on the earnings results from American, Continental, Southwest, and Delta Air Lines will be included in this week’s PlaneBusiness Banter.